|
Advertisement----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Advertisement |
|
|
by |
WEEKLY ROUNDUP: AN INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY
Recap and analysis of the week in state government
By Jim O'Sullivan
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE
STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, AUG. 27, 2010……..The huddled masses of the People's Chamber
gathered Thursday in the Omni Parker House Hotel, discussing reelection
strategies and, to borrow a phrase, the good and the bad, the ecstasy, the
remorse, and sorrow, the people and the places and how the weather was. There
were pollsters on hand.
It is election season. Or, more precisely, it's almost election season. The
usual clichés apply.
There were the handful of House members who should be worried but will probably
be fine, those who aren't concerned but should be, and others lounging blithely
and thanking their stars no one bothered to pull papers against them.
If you're an incumbent, you want to talk about how important jobs and education
are. As a challenger, those themes are relevant, aggressively framed through a
throw-the-bums-out prism bedazzled with words like "change," "clean up," and
"repopulate."
Atop the billing, Republican Charles Baker and Independent Treasurer Timothy
Cahill put their monies where their mouths have been, ponying up for TV ad buys
that reinforced much of what they've been talking about for well over a year
now. Now those who haven't been paying attention can get it summarized in
synchronized soundbites.
Baker: bringing spending in line with revenues, cutting taxes and restoring
employment.
Cahill: an unspecified jobs plan, a record of fiscal conservatism at the School
Building Authority, and a confusing statement about running the Lottery "with no
scandals," a clear jab at the taxpayer-funded defense of Cahill in a federal
civil suit accusing him of fixing state contracts for campaign donations. It's
an awkward drop-in line in the ad, seemingly inviting Baker to jump on him. And
Patrick, too, had the governor's team not decided long ago that Tim Cahill is
the best thing to happen to Deval Patrick since Tom Reilly.
The governor is running into trouble with two vital constituencies: organized
labor and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino, neither of whom has gone full-throttle -
or even quarter-throttle, really - in backing their fellow Democrat. The AFL-CIO
is pointedly revealing hip-level expanses of leg to Cahill, who has returned the
favor in the form of praise for public employee unions while simultaneously
dropping the cuff by vowing to cut taxes.
Both labor and the mayor have demonstrated weaknesses within their political
machines in recent years - see, respectively, "Brown, Scott," now a U.S.
senator, and "Obama, Barack," now president of the United States - but they
matter in the ground game.
"I haven't endorsed anybody. But I like Deval," Menino said, wryly reprising the
governor's own amiable refusal to involve himself in last year's mayor's race.
More on the mayor below.
A hybrid product of the Boston-labor political complex predicted victory for
Patrick in November, and offered a partial explanation for why. I haven't
endorsed anybody, but I like Deval
"I think at this point he's fortunate that Tim Cahill is a factor, because I
would be worried if he were to have to face the Republican opponent, Charlie
Baker, one-on-one," Rep. Stephen Lynch said of his fellow Democrat.
The Baker camp used this week as its opportunity to point out the burgeoning
summer love between Patrick and Cahill, one of the odder couples in recent
politics. Cahill is, to the Patrick camp, an untouchable, his value rendered
ever higher by his proven ability to curry 15 percent of the vote, much of which
is in outright denial of Baker's odds. Don't go bet on Patrick attack ads
against Cahill.
Patrick can also count in the plus column this week's big education news, $250
million in hard-earned federal aid traceable, cheerleaders said, to the systemic
overhaul passed in January.
On the negative side of the ledger, along with the ailing national economy, some
unpleasant outcroppings on the state front, most visibly the Tuesday housing
numbers, which showed July home sales down 28 percent from a year ago, the first
slip in 12 months and the state's largest monthly drop since March 2008, when
stuff was just starting to get ugly. Volume stooped to its lowest in 20 years.
Market inventory continues to grow.
As does the national bloodlust for Scott Brown, who is now a U.S. senator. Brown
drew opprobrium this week from Sarah Palin, former Alaskan governor and Wasillan
mayor, perhaps the only person on the planet who can appreciate what it's like
to catapult into the celeb-politico stratosphere in the same neck-snapping
fashion. Taking Downtown out at the knees seemed Palin's goal when she
pronounced that Alaska's three electoral votes would be off-limits for the Bay
State renegade, whose electorate-balancing efforts evidently ran afoul of the
former governor, who jumped ugly this week with the junior senator, saying that
Alaskan voters would not "wouldn't stand for" Brown's "antics."
Games on.
STORY OF THE WEEK: The electorate begins taking heed.
LANGUAGE ARTS: During Tuesday afternoon's furious back-patting in the wake of
the $250 million federal education award - and, while most such press
conferences are brutally self-congratulatory, this one turned the excruciation
up a notch, to the point where it at one point became unclear whether the
speakers considered the purse a personal financial gift of some sort - Education
Secretary Paul Reville took time to thank one of the other people sharing the
stage for discouraging the state from "limp-wristed" efforts at pitching the
feds on the Commonwealth's worthiness, word choice that perked a few ears grown
limp from the blather. Asked for clarification, administration aides initially
said they had not heard Reville say that. Then the education secretariat press
operation, which consists largely of spoon-feeding "moderate allies" information
while accusing delegates from presumptive non-allies of excessive anger, even
when such anger is justified, swung into an admirably aggressive fact-finding
mode and evidently asked the secretary what he said. Reville "definitely did not
mean anything by it," spokesman Jonathan Palumbo reported back, summarily
describing the entire marathon event. "I'm not quite sure frankly that he
understands what the issue is." Indeed.
TABLOID LAUREATE: Every once in a while there is a happy collision of subject
matter and principal, recent evidence of which materialized during Boston Mayor
Thomas Menino's visit upon a Newbury Street spa, the likes of which, according
to the Boston Herald's excellent coverage of the incident, the mayor had not
frequented previously. In a tone poem of touching detail, scribe Jessica Van
Sack chronicled the mayor's sojourn past brine inhalation chambers and nap pods.
Of course, the poetess got a little help from the mayor himself, who, standing
outside the hot tub room, inquired of the proprietor, "You go bare in there?" In
the annals of mayoral rhetoric, there's Pericles's Third Oration, the line about
the sparrow dying in Central Park, and Tom Menino wondering about birthday
suits.
--END--
08/27/2010
http://www.statehousenews.com
SHNS Home Page